Appraising Art for Tax Deductions: Lessons from a Recent Case on “Qualified Appraisers” and Reasonable Cause

Donating significant works of art to museums is a commendable act, enriching public access to culture and often forming a key part of a family’s philanthropic legacy. For many collectors, the available income tax deduction is also an important consideration. However, the path to securing that deduction is paved with complex IRS rules, particularly concerning valuations and appraisals.

A recent U.S. Tax Court decision, WT Art Partnership LP v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2025-30, highlights just how technical these rules are, especially regarding who can appraise your art for tax purposes. It also offers insights into a potential saving grace – the “reasonable cause” exception – but underscores the risks involved. As advisors committed to empowering clients with knowledge for sound financial decisions, we delve into this important case.

The Paintings, The Met, and The Tax Court: WT Art Partnership LP v. Commissioner

This case involved WT Art Partnership LP (“WT Art”) – associated with noted philanthropist Oscar Tang – which donated several highly valuable early Chinese paintings to the Metropolitan Museum of Art (the Met) in New York between 2010 and 2012. WT Art claimed charitable deductions totaling over $73 million based on appraisals performed by China Guardian Auction Co. Ltd. (“China Guardian”), a major Chinese auction house with expertise in Chinese art, and at the time, the second largest auction house in China.

The IRS disallowed the deductions entirely. Its primary argument was that the appraisals were not “qualified appraisals” conducted by a “qualified appraiser” as strictly defined under U.S. tax law for high-value donations. Alternatively, the IRS challenged the fair market value of at least one of the paintings.

The Tax Court’s decision was nuanced:

1. Not a “Qualified Appraisal”: The court agreed with the IRS that the appraisals technically failed the requirements. Although China Guardian was a leading expert in the specific art, the individual(s) performing the appraisal did not meet the definition of a “qualified appraiser” under Treasury Regulations. This definition requires specific credentials, education, and experience recognized within the U.S. tax context, and proof of regularly performing appraisals for compensation. The court found that neither China Guardian nor any of its employees involved in preparing the appraisals were “qualified appraisers,” as there was no evidence that any of them had education and experience in valuing ancient Chinese art. While China Guardian was an auction house that provided estimates of prices at which artwork might be sold, these were not appraisals, and there was no evidence that China Guardian or its employees regularly performed appraisal services or held themselves out as appraisers.
2. Reasonable Cause Exception Applied: Despite the failure to meet the strict appraisal requirements, the court allowed the deductions based on the “reasonable cause” exception. This rule allows a deduction if the failure to meet the requirements was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. The court found that WT Art acted reasonably and in good faith. It had selected a highly reputable international auction house with undisputed expertise in the niche area of early Chinese paintings, believing it was obtaining a proper valuation. WT Art also previously used China Guardian to prepare appraisals for ancient Chinese paintings donated to the Met in 2005 – though the 2005 return was selected for IRS examination, the IRS exam team allowed 90% of the deduction WT Art originally claimed on its 2005 return and never suggested that China Guardian was not a “qualified appraiser.” The court felt this genuine effort and WT Art’s past experience with the IRS regarding China Guardian’s qualifications constituted reasonable cause for the technical lapse.
3. Valuation Still Matters: For one painting, Palace Banquet, where the value remained disputed, the court determined its Fair Market Value (FMV) to be $12 million – significantly less than $26 million value initially implied by WT Art’s aggregate deduction but higher than the IRS expert’s lowest figure of $10 million.¹

Key takeaways:

• The IRS definitions for “qualified appraisal” and “qualified appraiser” are highly technical and specific to U.S. tax law. Expertise alone, even world-renowned, isn’t enough if the appraiser doesn’t meet the IRS criteria.
• Relying on foreign experts, however prominent in their field, can be risky unless you verify that they meet the specific U.S. “qualified appraiser” standards defined under U.S. tax law and regulations.
• While the “reasonable cause” exception provided relief here, relying on it is precarious. It requires demonstrating a compelling case of good faith efforts to comply, and success is not guaranteed. Proactive compliance is always the better strategy.
• Even if appraisal formalities are excused, the underlying valuation must still be supportable.

Refresher: IRS Appraisal Rules for Art Donations

The WT Art case underscores the need to meticulously follow IRS rules (detailed in IRS Publication 561, Determining the Value of Donated Property):²

1. Fair Market Value (FMV): Your deduction hinges on the art’s FMV at the donation date.
2. Qualified Appraisal: Mandatory for any donated property with a claimed value over $5,000. The qualified appraisal must meet strict timing and content rules. For example, the qualified appraisal must be signed and dated by the qualified appraiser not earlier than 60 days before the date you donate the property and no later than the due date (including extensions) of the return on which you first claim a deduction for the property. For art over $20,000, the qualified appraisal must be attached to your tax return.
3. Qualified Appraiser: A “qualified appraiser” must have specific credentials, education, and experience recognized under U.S. tax regulations, regularly perform qualified appraisals for pay, demonstrate expertise in the specific art type, and be independent (e.g., not related or subordinate to the donor, donee, or a party to the transaction in which the donor originally acquired the donated property). The WT Art case shows that meeting the requirements of a qualified appraiser under U.S. tax regulations is a critical hurdle.
4. Substantiation (Form 8283): Requires signatures from the qualified appraiser and the receiving museum, confirming details of the gift and information from the qualified appraisal.
5. Related Use Rule: For a donor to deduct full FMV (for long-term holdings) for the donated art, the museum must use the art for its exempt purpose (e.g., display, study). Otherwise, the donor’s deduction is generally limited to the lower of cost basis or FMV.

Strategic Considerations After WT Art Case

For collectors contemplating significant art donations, the WT Art decision adds important layers to strategic planning:

• Vet Appraiser Qualifications Rigorously: Don’t assume prominence equals qualification under IRS rules. Specifically ask potential appraisers if they meet the requirements outlined in Treasury Regulation §1.170A-17(b). Confirm their credentials, education, and experience performing appraisals for U.S. income tax purposes.
• Document Your Due Diligence: Keep records of how and why you selected your appraiser. This documentation could be vital if you ever need to argue “reasonable cause,” though the primary goal is full compliance.
• Consider U.S.-Based Experts: While expertise in the specific art is paramount, engaging a qualified appraiser thoroughly familiar with U.S. tax appraisal standards may reduce compliance risks. Sometimes, collaboration between a foreign subject matter expert and a U.S. qualified appraiser might be appropriate.
• Start Planning Early: Complex valuations and finding the right, qualified appraiser take time.
• Engage Your Advisory Team: Work closely with your financial advisor, tax professional, and potentially specialized art law counsel. We can help navigate these technical requirements, coordinate with appraisers, and ensure the donation aligns with your overall financial strategy.

Conclusion

The WT Art case doesn’t change the fundamental rules, but it sharply illuminates the technical precision required, especially regarding qualified appraiser qualifications. While the taxpayer ultimately succeeded through the reasonable cause exception, it highlights a significant risk area for donors.
Generosity through art donation remains a valuable tool for philanthropic expression and tax planning. However, ensuring that generosity is recognized by the IRS requires careful attention to detail and adherence to stringent rules. Proactive planning and expert guidance are essential to navigate these complexities successfully.

1 Source: WT Art Partnership LP v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2025-30
2 Sources: IRS Publication 561, IRS Form 8283 Instructions, IRC § 170(f)(11)), 26 CFR § 1.170A-17

Wealthspire Advisors is the common brand and trade name used by Wealthspire Advisors LLC and its subsidiaries, separate registered investment advisers and subsidiary companies of NFP Corp., an Aon company. © 2025 Wealthspire Advisors

This material should not be construed as a recommendation, offer to sell, or solicitation of an offer to buy a particular security or investment strategy. The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon for accounting, legal, or tax advice. While the information is deemed reliable, Wealthspire Advisors cannot guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose, and makes no warranties with regard to the results to be obtained from its use.

Wealthspire Advisors and its representatives do not provide legal or tax advice, and Wealthspire Advisors does not act as law, accounting, or tax firm. Services provided by Wealthspire Advisors are not intended to replace any tax, legal or accounting advice from a tax/legal/accounting professional. The services of an appropriate professional should be sought regarding your individual situation. You should not act or refrain from acting based on this content alone without first seeking advice from your tax and/or legal advisors.

Certain employees of Wealthspire Advisors may be certified public accountants or licensed to practice law. However, these employees do not provide tax, legal, or accounting services to any of clients of Wealthspire Advisors, and clients should be mindful that no attorney/client relationship is established with any of Wealthspire Advisors’ employees who are also licensed attorneys.